# Evaluating Changes

Changes can be reviewed by checking a component's history in the History View. To learn more, please visit the following chapter:

{% content-ref url="/pages/-MX7RPtY4HR1X\_W4pVRz" %}
[Concept History](/snow-owl-authoring-platform/editing-and-authoring/evaluating-changes/concept-history.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}

To be sure that all the modifications are correct Snow Owl provides validation during the editing process and afterward by running validation scripts as well. To learn more, please visit the following chapter:

{% content-ref url="/pages/-MX7RYp6EPb5ek\_o5NgO" %}
[Validation](/snow-owl-authoring-platform/editing-and-authoring/evaluating-changes/validating-concepts.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}

There is also a way to verify if the newly created components are semantically valid and if they maintain the consistency and coherence of the ontology. To learn more, please visit the following chapter:

{% content-ref url="/pages/-MX7RnIEBt4Jq0vDp9Fd" %}
[Classification](/snow-owl-authoring-platform/editing-and-authoring/evaluating-changes/classifying.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.b2ihealthcare.com/snow-owl-authoring-platform/editing-and-authoring/evaluating-changes.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.